Israel’s decision to expand its military operations into Gaza City has drawn sharp condemnation from several European governments, human rights groups, and the United Nations. The move, approved by Israel’s security cabinet and led by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, aims to dismantle Hamas infrastructure but has been criticized as a dangerous escalation that will deepen Gaza’s humanitarian crisis.
Strong European Opposition
Eight European nations, including Spain, Ireland, Luxembourg, Malta, Norway, Portugal, Slovenia, and Iceland, issued a joint statement condemning the planned occupation of Gaza City. The countries argued that the offensive would cause mass displacement, breach international law, and undermine prospects for a two-state solution. They called for an immediate ceasefire, expanded humanitarian aid, and the safe release of all hostages.
Germany has gone a step further, suspending military exports that could be used in Gaza, breaking from its long-standing policy of supplying arms to Israel. European Union officials have also warned that such actions could fundamentally alter relations between Israel and the bloc.
UN Raises Alarm
UN Secretary-General António Guterres has warned that the planned operation risks triggering catastrophic consequences, including large-scale civilian casualties and destruction. UN human rights experts have also said the offensive would violate rulings from the International Court of Justice and further erode the viability of a two-state solution.
Internal Israeli Pushback
Within Israel, the plan has met resistance from hostage families and former military officials, who argue that a major assault on Gaza City could put the remaining captives’ lives in danger. Polls indicate growing public support for ending the war in exchange for their release rather than continuing urban combat.
Diplomatic Fallout
The move has also sparked transatlantic tensions. U.S. Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee criticized UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s opposition to the offensive, accusing him of appeasement. Starmer, in turn, said the plan would only lead to more bloodshed and urged a ceasefire, greater humanitarian aid, and a post-war governance arrangement in Gaza that excludes Hamas.
The Road Ahead
Netanyahu’s Gaza strategy has ignited an unprecedented wave of dissent both at home and abroad. With mounting international pressure, internal political divisions, and humanitarian concerns growing by the hour, the coming weeks will test whether Israel stays the course or shifts under global and domestic scrutiny.
Leave a Reply